Scholars have raised deep concerns on the impact of terrorism legislative framework on individual liberty and liberal doctrines of law. 通过法庭实证研究, it is aimed to examine the implementation of terrorism laws and the emerging role of national courts as transnationalized 演员:这些法庭如何加强, 保护, 并在恐怖主义背景下推动某些政治目标和愿景.
2017年开始, Prof Weill has been conducting ethnographic research within French terrorism trials in a project financed by the French Ministry of Justice (2017-2019) and Open Society Justice Initiative (2018/ Courtwatch).
One of the most remarkable things about this trial was that it worked like two processes running in parallel, 几乎没有联系, 作为受害者的平台, 但这是一个刑事案件. During the “truth commission” element of the trial, victims recounted the horrors of the attacks. 审判的刑事责任要素, 恰恰相反, 似乎和这些事件没什么关系, 受审的人与受害者叙述的事实明显相去甚远. This suggests that there may be things to learn from the domain of transitional justice where both criminal justice, 真情流露的, 问责制设置也要考虑在内.
In 2020, 电子mg官方网站的学生与威尔教授一起观察了具有历史意义的《电子mg官方网站》审判 法律与冲突 类和生产 这本杂志.
During this project we observed terrorism proceedings before criminal and administrative courts and initiated students form Sciences po 巴黎 and 巴黎 2 to do trial monitoring. We submitted a report to the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and 保护ion of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism. 该项目由开放社会基金会和OSJI(2019-2020)资助.
莎伦威尔, “Military Courts and Terrorism: The 9/11 Trial before the Guantanamo Bay Military Jurisdiction”, in B. 索尔,国际法和恐怖主义研究手册 (爱德华·埃尔加,2020年).